莎朗•斯通到底说了什么话？

摘自多维--张三来稿

电影演员莎朗斯通（Sharon Stone）在戛纳慈善晚会接受媒体采访，说了关于中国汶川地震的一段话，其中据说有地震是对中国的报应等语，受到了数以百万计中国网民的愤怒围剿。据说，“无视生命者，没有资格讨论生命!”(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYoZEn9vlzE

“Well you know it was very interesting because at first, you know, I am not happy about the ways the Chinese were treating the Tibetans because I don’t think anyone should be unkind to anyone else. And so I have been very concerned about how to think and what to do about that because I don’t like that. And I had been this, you know, concerned about, oh how should we deal with the Olympics because they are not being nice to the Dalai Lama, who is a good friend of mine.

And all these earthquake and stuff happened and I thought: Is that karma, when you are not nice that bad things happen to you? And then I got a letter, from the Tibetan Foundation that they want to go and be helpful. And that made me cry. And they ask me if I would write a quote about that and I said,“I would.”And it was a big lesson to me, that some times you have to learn to put your head down and be of service even to people who are not nice to you. And that’s a big lesson for me...”

把一个反问句说成肯定句；而寥寥数语中就重复两遍的“这对我是一个很大的教训”，却被统统视而不见。这还是白纸黑字连翻译都在屏幕上，却集体失明如此。

中国有几句老话，一个叫做己所不欲、勿施于人；一个叫做己身不正、何以正人；如果用俗话那就是，说话之前先撒泡尿照照自己。

美 国911，不知道在哪里欢声雷动？日本新泻地震、千岛群岛地震，不知道又是哪里充满欢声笑语？才三个星期前的韩国海溢49人被卷进大海，又是在哪里，绝 大多数人都支持这是报应、说这是活该？那个时节，又有几个人想到人性高于国籍、高于民族？应该先是人还是先是某国人这样一个举世共知的常识题目，不都竟然 是中文论坛经久不衰的话题？

无独有偶，以人民日报子报环球时报为首的中国主流媒体，前两天因应“德国华人”的“愤怒”，正在发起对两三个 “德国神秘网民频发反华言论”的大批判。尽管 这两三位不过是在德国媒体论坛各自发了几个帖子批评中国，就据说“带有极大的误导性。一位研究政治的华人学者认为，他们很可能是有特殊背景的‘情报人员 ’，旨在挑起中国内部和中德矛盾”。中文论坛上这样的、或者远比这样更为激烈的反美、反日、反德、反法……反很多国家和民族的言论都成百万上千万，环球时报何以舍近求远、舍众求寡，不为国家和民族安危着想，利用自身优势揪出身边多上数万倍的发表仇外言论的“神秘网民”、看看他们是带有什么背景的“情报人员”，却越俎代庖万里迢迢，到德国网站去抓特务？

待 人极严，连思想都不可以，哪怕坦率叙述自己心路历程并进行反省，都仍然可以为之怒不可遏、万众声讨；待己极宽，哪怕大多数做了同样乃至更出格的事，都可 以得到理所当然的宽容。可以理直气壮嘲笑别人几颗青春痘，对满头疮疖的自己，却是坦然处之。当时的无视生命者，莫非今天都不在讨论生命么？